Search for: "Fictitious Defendant #1" Results 161 - 180 of 606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2012, 11:48 am by thehealthlawfirm
Rather than incur the legal expenses involved in defending against the complaint in State 1, psychologist, LMHC, or other professional moves to State 2, begins practicing there and voluntarily relinquishes his/her license in State 1. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:17 pm by Ken
In the meantime, a few points: 1. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:21 pm
This strategy worked pretty well for the defendants in this case. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 1:03 pm by S. COTUS
  Somehow, because these defendants hate America so much that they 1) didn’t go to law school; and 2) talked to the cops without a lawyer, the First figures that even though they were ordered out of the hotel room and into the hall, their interrogation wasn’t custodial. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:09 am by Laura Orr
"Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for giving false information to a police officer, ORS 162.385(1)(b), arguing that the trial court erred in denying her motion for a judgment of acquittal because no rational trier of fact could have found that the officer to whom she lied about her identity had asked for her name for the purpose of arresting her on a warrant. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 12:53 pm by Russell Mace
In some cases, the four created fictitious short sale offers to purchase some of the properties. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm
In their 157 page filing, they charge Judge Contini with, among other things: 1. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 5:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  The court referred to TXJ’s practice as looking at “what a fictitious retailer may charge. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 9:41 am by Sami Azhari
Where no specific statute can be used to prosecute a false statement, the United States Attorney can use 18 USC 1001 to prosecute the defendant. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Quarterman, No. 06-70048 Denial of a habeas corpus petition in a capital murder case is affirmed where: 1) several ineffective assistance of counsel claims failed for lack of evidence of either deficient counsel or of prejudice to defendant; 2) a Brady claim failed because the evidence alleged to have been withheld consisted of defendant's own statements; and 3) the government's use of inconsistent theories in the separate trials of co-defendants did not… [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 5:00 am by Barry Seidel
During my second year, I took a part time job at a small Austin law firm, Montague & Smith* (*all names fictitious, all stories are true). [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 58 AD3d 1, 9-10 [2008]; Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 271 [2004]. [read post]