Search for: "G.L. "
Results 161 - 180
of 545
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2016, 10:32 am
’ [The trooper] concluded that the defendant was using the vehicle without authority, in violation of G.L. c.90, §24(2)(a), which makes it illegal to ‘use[] a motor vehicle without authority knowing that such use is unauthorized. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 10:25 am
[At their arraignments,] [p]ursuant to G.L. c.276, §38, probable cause hearings were scheduled for [both] defendant[s,] [in order] to determine whether there was sufficient evidence to bind them over to the Superior Court for trial. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 7:51 am
The rapid expansion in mobile communication has stretched the limits of many longstanding legal frameworks, including the Statute of Frauds (“SOF”) (G.L. c. 259 § 1). [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
Plaintiff 11 Gould Street, LLC initiated this action pursuant to G.L. c. 40A, § 17, to challenge the decision of the Town of Stoneham Board of Appeals to uphold a cease and desist order issued by the Town’s Building Inspector. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 10:24 am
SJC–Attorney Affidavits Pursuant to G.L. c. 183, sec. 5B May Cure Defective Notary Acknowledgment The Court first went over the general rule that a defective notary acknowledgment is usually grounds to void any recordable instrument altogether. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:58 am
George, a family law case that raises the question of "whether a judge, on a complaint for modification of an alimony judgment that predated the Alimony Reform Act, may properly deviate from the durational limits of G.L. c. 208, § 49, on the basis that the alimony provisions of the parties' separation agreement, which were merged into the judgment, were inextricably connected with the property division provisions of the agreement, which survived the judgment. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:58 am
George, a family law case that raises the question of "whether a judge, on a complaint for modification of an alimony judgment that predated the Alimony Reform Act, may properly deviate from the durational limits of G.L. c. 208, § 49, on the basis that the alimony provisions of the parties' separation agreement, which were merged into the judgment, were inextricably connected with the property division provisions of the agreement, which survived the judgment. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:58 am
George, a family law case that raises the question of "whether a judge, on a complaint for modification of an alimony judgment that predated the Alimony Reform Act, may properly deviate from the durational limits of G.L. c. 208, § 49, on the basis that the alimony provisions of the parties' separation agreement, which were merged into the judgment, were inextricably connected with the property division provisions of the agreement, which survived the judgment. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 9:32 am
However, the “special provision” available to certain Massachusetts employees is in fact an exception to the general rules set forth in G.L. c. 152. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 9:32 am
However, the “special provision” available to certain Massachusetts employees is in fact an exception to the general rules set forth in G.L. c. 152. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 9:32 am
However, the “special provision” available to certain Massachusetts employees is in fact an exception to the general rules set forth in G.L. c. 152. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 4:10 am
The Guidance suggests that in some situations, the anti-discrimination ban can apply to churches:Under G.L. c. 272, § 98, places of public accommodation may not discriminate against, or restrict a person from services because of that person’s gender identity. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:53 pm
Both were charged with unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of G.L. c. 269 Section 10(h). [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 2:09 pm
The pending redraft amends G.L. c. 266, § 30 by increasing the threshold for a misdemeanor larceny from $250 to $1,500. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 2:09 pm
The pending redraft amends G.L. c. 266, § 30 by increasing the threshold for a misdemeanor larceny from $250 to $1,500. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:07 pm
The decision addresses pre-trial detention under the dangerousness statute (G.L. c.276, §58A) and under what circumstances the Commonwealth may move for dangerousness. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:07 pm
The decision addresses pre-trial detention under the dangerousness statute (G.L. c.276, §58A) and under what circumstances the Commonwealth may move for dangerousness. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 1:09 pm
See G.L. c. 108A. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:43 am
Instead, the employer’s “self-insured” status is one created by G.L. c. 152 section 25A , and the self-insurer is in fact regulated by the department. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:43 am
Instead, the employer’s “self-insured” status is one created by G.L. c. 152 section 25A , and the self-insurer is in fact regulated by the department. [read post]
