Search for: "Georgia Pacific Corp"
Results 161 - 180
of 204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2010, 2:52 pm
The first Georgia-Pacific factor: 1. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Click Here Pacific Pipelines to pay penalty for oil spill. - Eric Watkins, Oil & Gas Journal, January 25, 2010 The US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said Pacific Pipeline Systems LLP, a Long Beach, Calif. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Host America Corp., 453 [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
The CAFC cited Georgia-Pacific:To support his royalty calculation, Wagner adjusted the baseline royalty rate of ($96) using the factors set out in Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:30 pm
Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:26 pm
" (quoting Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Union Pacific Railroad Co., 50 S.W.3d 226, 249 (Mo. 2001); Lopez v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Army Corps of Engineers for another look. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 11:00 am
Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of Health and Human Services and other federal agencies are on the ground in American Samoa. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:54 pm
See Georgia-Pacific, 195 F.3d at 1326 ("Under obviousness-type double patenting, a patent is invalid when it is merely an obvious variation of an invention disclosed and claimed in an earlier patent by the same inventor. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 12:48 pm
Both arguments were rejected by the Court of Appeals for reasons which languished within the thirty subsequent pages of analysis that considered the 15 factors to be addressed when calculating patent damages in Georgia-Pacific v US Plywood Corp (1970).Factors 2, 10, 11, and 13 were considered by the Court in full:Factor 2: "The rates paid by the licensee for the use of other patents comparable in the patent suit. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 5:47 am
"The remainder of the 64-page opinion addressed the issue of damages, where the court provided its most detailed analysis of the Georgia-Pacific factors in recent memory. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:22 am
The suit names subsidiaries of the Miami-based home builder, Lennar Corp., and drywall manufacturers, Georgia-Pacific Corp. of Atlanta, Georgia as defendants. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
Georgia-Pacific Corp., No. 1:08-CV-1394 (S.D. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 9:59 am
The lawsuit, which seeks class action status for all residents of the state suffering health problems because of Chinese drywall, names subsidiaries of Miami-based homebuilder Lennar Corp. and drywall manufacturer Georgia-Pacific Corp. of Atlanta as defendants. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 7:47 am
The complaint names US Home Corp., Greystone Nevada LLC, Lennar Nevada, Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC and Georgia-Pacific LLC. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 6:31 am
Georgia Pacific Corp., a paper and building-products manufacturer, in February gave a large piece of commercial litigation to Houston-based Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Martin, which has about 100 lawyers. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 2:15 am
AutoNation saved 20% to 25% on fees by retaining Angelo & Banta.Georgia Pacific Corp. gave a chunk of commercial litigation work to Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Martin, a Houston-based law firm with about 100 lawyers. [read post]
