Search for: "Howard J. Edwards"
Results 161 - 173
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Howard W. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
According to one press report, Angel Diaz "appeared to be moving 24 minutes after the first injection, grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and appearing to mouth words". [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
(f/k/a Plimus).David J. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
[Wearing improvised masks in public will help defeat the viral invasion] Fast reduction of the COVID-19 pandemic is necessary for public health, re-opening the American economy, restoration of rights and liberties, and prevention of large second or third waves. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
This is a long, tedious post. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
This is a long, tedious post. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Afro-IP)Australia Professor Fitzgerald’s opinion article ‘It’s vital to sort out ownership of ideas’: (IP:KCE)BrazilBrazil wrestles with decision on GM corn, seed patenting: (Intellectual Property Watch),PTO recognized as international patent search authority: (International Law Office)CanadaTrade mark statistics - CIPO 2006-2007 Annual Report: (Canadian Trademark Blog)IP injunctions in Canada: (ipblog.ca),Professor Ariel Katz’ research project on… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Dead Men and Punitive Damages - In Iowa you can't sue an estate for punitive damages. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
Edward A. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:06 am
In a prior decision (345 NLRB No. 83 (2005)), the Board remanded the case to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for reassignment after the Respondent contended that Judge Howard Edelman had improperly copied extensive portions of the General Counsel's and the Charging Party's posthearing briefs into his decision. [read post]
