Search for: "JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT, Former"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
Can a defendant have a removable colorable defense when accused of obstruction of justice or perjury? [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
California – California Boards Want to Keep Pandemic Rules for Public Meetings. [read post]
How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, has significantly weakened campaign finance law. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Instead, they are going back to the same federal court after the Supreme Court weighed in, this time to argue their attempts at coming up with a new map are good enough. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 9:06 pm
” The EATS Act would overturn the Supreme Court’s May 11, 2023, ruling that, with a 5-to-4 vote, found states have the right to regulate products sold within their state. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
The Supreme Court has said that to prevail, a plaintiff needs a "judicially sanctioned change" in the parties' legal relationship. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court Struggling to Agree on Ethics Policy, Justice Kagan Says MSN – Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 8/3/2023 Justice Elena Kagan said the Supreme Court, which has faced criticism over lavish, undisclosed free travel by some of her colleagues, is struggling to devise an ethics policy despite continued discussion. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 am
The Recorder (8/4/23) California Supreme Court Expands Ability of Public Interest and Non-Profit Trade Groups to Sue for Alleged Unfair Business Practices Under Section 17200 of The Business & Professions Code (Womble Bond Dickinson, JD Supra) 33 Leaders Standing Up to Big Tech in the Age of A.I. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Limits of Congressional Power to Regulate Supreme Court Untested MSN – Michael Macagnone (Roll Call) | Published: 8/2/2023 Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito Jr. started a flurry of conversation among judicial and congressional experts when he expressed a self-proclaimed “controversial view” that Congress does not have “the authority to regulate the Supreme Court – period. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 6:09 pm
Last year, Newsom named Kelli Evans to the California Supreme Court, making her the first and so far only former public defender to sit there. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:53 am
To defend their environmental records and products, 3M, like other manufacturers, has invoked the "government contractor" defense recognized by the Supreme Court in 1988. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:42 am
Newsom appointed Alexander DeVorkin to be the Chief Justice of the California Courts-Martial Appellate Panel and David McCray and Mark Inaba as Justices on that panel. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court (2019): The tribe's hunting right survived Wyoming's statehood, and the forest isn't occupied land. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court, as well as the absence of a binding ethics code for the justices. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
Supreme Court’s interpretation, a point that Justice Sotomayor flagged in a concurrence. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 7:34 am
” “In CJEO Expedited Opinion 2023-050, the committee concludes appellate justices have an obligation under the California Code of Judicial Ethics and the Code of Ethics for the Court Employees of California to disqualify a staff attorney from working on any part of an appellate matter in which the staff attorney’s prior service as a lawyer in the proceeding would have been disqualifying for the justice had the justice served in… [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 12:58 pm
Second Circuit: Since council meetings are what kids these days (and the Supreme Court) call "limited public fora," no. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal Supreme Court Justices and Donors Mingle at Campus Visits. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
*** No Supreme Court pick is perfect. [read post]
