Search for: "Jane Does 1-15" Results 161 - 180 of 369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
For example, the District Attorney . . . suggested to you that Jane Doe . . . 1 has lived with fear for 15 years and she would now finally get peace. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:00 am by Peter Berlin
Jane Doe #1 allegedly woke up naked hours later with Sharper sexually assaulting her. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:00 am by Jennifer S. Taub
In fact, 1 in 8 bankruptcies that start as restructurings do not result in a rehabilitated firm. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:11 am by Steven M. Gursten
  Brain injury doesn’t go away when the lawsuit does, despite what some not very kind people may think. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:23 am
Defendants John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company who are sued herein under fictitious names because their true names and capacities are unknown at this time. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 9:23 am by David Urban
San Diego) Note: It is general practice in litigation to protect the accused student’s identity by referencing them as “John Doe” in the case caption and pleadings, and often the alleged victim is referenced as “Jane Roe. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Jan. 5, Jan. 12, Jan. 19, Feb. 16, Feb. 23, Mar. 1, Mar. 15, Mar. 22, Mar. 28, Apr. 12, Apr. 19, Apr. 26, May 9, May 16, May 23 and May 30 conferences) L.W. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am by John Elwood
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am by MOTP
Feb. 2, 2020) (Opinion by Justice Jane Nenninger Bland) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 18-0228 ══════════ ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER, LP AND TEXAS HEALTHCARE ALLIANCE LLC , PETITIONERS, v. [read post]