Search for: "John Doe's 1-10" Results 161 - 180 of 2,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2024, 5:08 am
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion: Precedential No. 34: TTAB Dismisses Monster Energy's Section 2(d) Claim On Summary Judgment Due to DIssimilarity of Design Marks Precedential No. 29: After an Exhausting 2(d) Analysis, TTAB Finds HME (Stylized) Confusable with KME for Building Products Precedential No. 27: TTAB Renders Split Decision in Appeal From Section 2(d) Refusal of IMPACT for Various Healthcare Services Precedential No. 12: TTAB Hands Win to MLBPA and… [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 5:48 pm
But if Obama does not take Georgia and Alabama, he's got no claim to a sweep. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff sued under the pseudonym "John Doe" to avoid risking further harm to his employment prospects. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 5:43 am by John A. Gallagher
Paid Sick Leave is Required for Philadelphia WorkersHere is a summary of Philadelphia's Promoting Healthy Families and Workplace Ordinance:·       Ordinance covers all employees who work within city limits at least 40 hours a year (so if you work for company primarily in suburbs, but venture into Philly to work for a total of 40 hours a year or more, you are covered);·       Employers with 10 or… [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 5:22 pm
Read Matt Lister's and John Oberdiek's comments and Tamanaha's response.3. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:38 am by Eugene Volokh
District court: Several of the airport's speech restrictions may be unconstitutional; among other things, there isn't a formal process to expedite a permit request and a ban on signs larger than 1 foot by 1 foot is not reasonable. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Sept. 12, 2006) (Order).........................15Tr. of Test. of John Doe No.1, Taylor v.Crawford, No. 05-4173 (W.D. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
The Consent Order applies to the parties to it and their successors in interest, and TSI does not admit or deny any of the Consent Order's findings of fact or conclusions of law. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 4:58 am
: Even assuming arguendo that PIERRE DE COUBERTIN were the USOC's name or identity, or a close approximation thereof, the Board found that the mark does not point uniquely and unmistakably to the USOC. [read post]