Search for: "John Doe and/or Jane Doe, #2" Results 161 - 180 of 405
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In this case, the District Court explained the record did not show that a significant number of class members would have a claim against Massey and/or against one of the John/Jane Doe defendants. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:47 am by Eric Goldman
The Court will not dismiss the claims of Plaintiffs John Doe #8, Jane Does #9-10, John Doe #11, and David Ellis under Section 230 of the CDA. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
-Senior Counsel, Kohrman, Jackson & KrantzI had a law school professor that would often proffer the following two theories to rationalize court decisions (especially ones he seemingly did not understand): 1) the justices did not “get any”…. breakfast that morning; and 2) the government always wins. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
-Senior Counsel, Kohrman, Jackson & KrantzI had a law school professor that would often proffer the following two theories to rationalize court decisions (especially ones he seemingly did not understand): 1) the justices did not “get any”…. breakfast that morning; and 2) the government always wins. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:18 pm by Paul Maharg
  Final thoughts: doing and undoing], All Right Reserved. 2017.[1]John Gapper, Technology outsmarts the human investor’, Financial Times, 9 March 2017, p.11↩ [2]See eg Shulman, L.S., Elstein, A.S. (1975). [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by Jonathan Spontarelli
” But the filing does not list a foreign agent, one of the key purposes of a Foreign Agents Registration Act disclosure. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner, Amira Mikhail
Four of the plaintiffs (Paul Harrison, two John Does, and a Jane Doe) claim that Section 2(c) of the E.O. will “prolong their separation from their loved ones,” by preventing them from obtaining visas, while “several” of the plaintiffs claim that the anti-Muslim animus in the executive caused them “feelings of disparagement and exclusion. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
The focus is on CSR (1) as a subject of legal regulation within states, (2) as a matter of international law and compliance beyond the state, and (3) as a tool and methodology for privatizing regulation through the enterprise itself operating in global production chains. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
Let’s say John Smith, a citizen of Connecticut, along with Jane Doe, a citizen of New Jersey, are co-members of Generic LLC, a New York limited liability company. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm by David Aronberg
(If the disease not disclosed to the other sexual partner was HIV, John would be guilty of violating 384.24(2), a third-degree felony.) [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:29 am by Andrew Sykes
In fact, I will repeat the same example I made up in that post: John and Jane Doe own the following: House $150,000 Checking and savings $50,000 Investment account $200,000 Jane’s IRA $100,000 John’s IRA $150,000 John’s whole life policy $25,000 (both face value and cash surrender value) If John enters a nursing home and applies for Medicaid, the following items are exempt: their house, Jane’s IRA (exempt… [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:27 am by Andrew Hamm
ACS, for instance, does not formally endorse or oppose nominees to the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:08 am by Quinta Jurecic
Senators John McCain and Jack Reed will also provide statements. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:32 am by Jordan Brunner
Bobby Chesney posted Episode 2 of the National Security Law Podcast: Immigration Constraints, Ground Ops in Yemen. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
Pryor clerked for Judge John Minor Wisdom on the U.S. [read post]