Search for: "Judicial Officers in Federal Courts"
Results 161 - 180
of 12,214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 6:23 am
First, the court dispensed with Treasury’s standing argument finding that the Plaintiffs had a redressable injury and the NSBU had associational standing in order to bring the suit in federal court. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:21 am
But it is only one piece in a complex matrix of state, federal and local cases, laws, regulations, ordinances and more – not to mention secondary legal materials – where many remain inaccessible to the public. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
As the Court said, individual states have the authority “to disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office” but not “federal offices, especially the Presidency. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Air Force The Scrubbed Scrubs Award: Ontario Ministry of Health, Canada The Judicial Blindfold Award: Mississippi Justice Courts It’s My Party and I Can Hide Records If I Want to Award: Wyoming Department of Education The Fee-l the Burn Award: Baltimore Police Department The Continuing Failure Award: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services The Creative Invoicing Award: Richmond, Va., Police Department The Not-So-Magic Word Award: Augusta County Sheriff’s… [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Given that the measure would add to the federal Constitution and include congressional enforce power, the baseline role of the Court and Congress would be a constant. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
In addition, these operationalizing features could logically flow—at a later time – from the adoption of a simple amendment such as the first paragraph of Rick’s formulation: it guarantees to “all citizen, adult, resident, nonfelons of the United States. . .the right to vote in all elections for federal, state, and local offices within their residential areas. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
While the decision was unanimous, the court’s three liberal justices also wrote separately, saying the conservative majority went too far and decided an issue that was not before the court to “insulate all alleged insurrectionists from future challenges to their holding office. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 7:23 pm
The first was a form of judicial slow walk. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 10:50 am
Child support is based on a formula, and the Family Court cannot print money. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:32 am
It has been a strong advocate for judicial independence and questioned why the immigration courts are attached to the Department of Justice, rather than being placed in an independent agency. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:28 am
Kirtz, in which the Court held that federal administrative agencies may be sued under the Fair Credit Reporting Act because Congress clearly waived federal sovereign immunity in that statute. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
Our federal securities laws lay out a basic bargain. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
And he's challenging that conviction in federal court to say, well, I my conviction is invalid because it was adjudicated issued by a judge who was barred from holding office by Section 3. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
And he's challenging that conviction in federal court to say, well, I my conviction is invalid because it was adjudicated issued by a judge who was barred from holding office by Section 3. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
On balance, I think letting states take the lead, subject to the important constraint of judicial review by federal courts, is better than relying on the federal government exclusively. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In a 2023 letter to the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal, the Canadian Bar Association (CBA) noted that the mispronunciation of names remained a common occurrence in courtrooms across Canada. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am
" The Court held states can disqualify insurrectionists from state office but not federal office, at least absent authorizing legislation from Congress. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
In short order, the federal courts will have to decide the very questions that Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Indeed, Griffin’s Case was about a state office, and the Court in Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Although the per curiam is hardly clear on this matter, it could be read to say that there is a lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards regarding how one proves that someone is ineligible to hold federal office as an insurrectionist. [read post]
