Search for: "LG Electronics Inc"
Results 161 - 180
of 484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2012, 9:48 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following respondents in this investigation: LG Electronics, Inc., of the Republic of Korea; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Mitsubishi Electric Corp. of Japan; Mitsubishi Electric US Holdings, Inc., of Cypress, CA; Mitsubishi Electric and Electronics USA, Inc., of Vernon Hills, IL; Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions America,… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:18 pm
The complaint alleges that LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea and LG Electronics, U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (collectively, “LG”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain integrated circuit packages provided with multiple heat-conducting paths and products containing same that infringe one or more claims of U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm
In the Order, ALJ Rogers denied Complainants LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Innotek Co. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:38 pm
Respondent LG Electronics, Inc. and other LG entities (collectively, LG) opposed the motion. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Ex Parte LG Electronics Deutschland GmbH (S.D. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:16 pm
’s (collectively, “OSRAM”) motion to exclude certain domestic industry products that Complainants LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Innotek Co. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Samsung Electronics Co. and LG Electronics Inc. (066570) have already paid $964 million in settlements to Kodak for using the technology. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Samsung Electronics Co. and LG Electronics Inc. (066570) have already paid $964 million in settlements to Kodak for using the technology. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:48 am
In opposition, Respondents LG Electronics, Inc., LG Innotek Co., Ltd., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:45 pm
Patent Nos. 6,701,523 (the ‘523 patent), 6,898,762 (the ‘762 patent), 7,065,709 (the ‘709 patent), 7,103,906 (the ‘906 patent), 7,225,455 (the ‘455 patent), 7,493,643 (the ‘643 patent), and 8,112,776 (the ‘776 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey Mitsubishi Electric Corp. of Japan… [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:10 pm
According to the Order, Respondents LG Electronics, Inc., LG Innotek Co., Ltd., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
According to the Order, OSRAM moved to compel Complainants LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Innotek Co. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:01 am
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. of Taiwan ASUS Computer International, Inc. of Fremont, California HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics… [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:15 pm
(collectively, “Samsung”), and LG Electronics, Inc., LG Innotek Co., Ltd., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc. [read post]
ITC Institutes Investigation (337-TA-836) Regarding Certain Consumer Electronics and Display Devices
9 Apr 2012, 8:42 am
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of… [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:58 am
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:30 am
Cal., Oct. 12, 2011); LG Elecs. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:24 am
HTC Corp.and LG Electronics were both named as respondents four times. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:35 am
What electronic device can you not live without? [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:03 pm
LG Electronics, Inc., 553 U.S. 617 (2008), the Supreme Court overruled Mallinckrodt sub silentio. [read post]
