Search for: "Legal Recoveries, Inc." Results 161 - 180 of 3,143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2023, 1:58 pm by Silver Law Group
Most cases handled on a contingent fee basis meaning that you do not pay legal fees unless we are successful. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The best my research could uncover were: Matter of Taines v Gene Barry One Hour Photo Process, Inc., where the court refused to grant the purchasing shareholders lenient payment terms based on their oppressive conduct (123 Misc 2d 529, 539 [Sup Ct, NY County 1983]); Matter of Elniski v Niagara Falls Coach Lines, Inc., which allowed installment payments (101 AD3d 1722, 1722 [4th Dept 2012]); and In re Rapid Recovery Enterprises, Inc., which… [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 1:26 pm by Morgan Cloud
This analysis follows from the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 11:30 am by Silver Law Group
Most cases handled on a contingent fee basis meaning that you do not pay legal fees unless we are successful. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 9:24 am by Silver Law Group
Most cases handled on a contingent fee basis meaning that you do not pay legal fees unless we are successful. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:54 pm by blaw.firm.admin
The OLB Group, Inc., 2023 NY Slip Op 30968(U), the court was asked to interpret two separate clauses in a contract governing how to resolve disputes regarding the sale/purchase of a business (M&A deal). [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:39 am by Eugene Volokh
" But "actual malice" isn't actually malice; rather, it's a legal term of art that, in this context, means publishing with the knowledge that the statement was false or likely false. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 5:49 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The authors note that these cases present a number of key legal issues. [read post]
At high level, Pine posited that the letter merely recited legal citations and weaved in precatory language which fell short of substantive demands. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:30 pm by Ben Vernia
“The jury’s verdict protects the integrity of the Medicare system for patients and those healthcare providers who operate fairly and legally. [read post]