Search for: "MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE"
Results 161 - 180
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 5:36 am
According to the complaint, J&J and its subsidiary, McNeil Consumer Healthcare, secretly contracted other parties to do a quiet store-by-store buyback of Motrin products in which defects had been discovered, rather than contact the Food and Drug Administration.Pittsburgh Firm Opens Second Ohio Office With MergerThe Legal IntelligencerPittsburgh-based Dickie McCamey has expanded its Ohio presence and bulked up its litigation capabilities through a merger with… [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 777 S.E.2d 176 (S.C. 2015). [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
”).As to deference, Defendants cite a non-binding case, Schering-Plough Healthcare Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, 2007 WL 121149, at *4 (S.D. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
McNeil Consumer Healthcare, 2014 WL 1116358 (E.D. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
McNeil Consumer Healthcare, 2013 U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
McNeil Consumer Healthcare, 615 F.3d 861 (7th Cir. 2010). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
If a car seat manufacturer recognized as the industry leader designed a popular car seat, could it be sued for injuries sustained by a consumer using a competitor's seat that copied the design? [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
McNeil Consumer Healthcare, 615 F.3d 861 (7th Cir. 2010); In re Fosamax, 951 F. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:18 am
This isn’t entirely breaking news; six months ago the Fourth Circuit reinstated the case over statute of limitations defenses, reported about here by the anti-consumer folks at Forbes. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., 2010 WL 3548474 (Pa. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharm., 682 F. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 81 Cal. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
Thus it protects consumers of prescription medical products from personal injury, and since the Act covers both warnings and design it's equally easy to say that the "particular hazard" causing injury is within the statute's scope as well.Right? [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
McNeil Consumer Healthcare, 2013 WL 9936293 (N.D. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:50 pm
Remember what Wyeth v. [read post]