Search for: "MILLER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 161 - 180
of 283
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 12:16 pm
See Miller v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:44 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:41 am
In Petrella v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:55 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:20 am
Castro v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
Today, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the government’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Dr. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:07 am
Miller, and Ryne V. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Indeed, Eugene V. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:19 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is not exactly known for enthusiastically enlarging its role, or that of the district courts, in managing day-to-day detention policy. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
Stay tuned for updates. 80/20 Inc v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed, finding that such boycotts were significantly expressive such that an ad hoc balancing of the competing interests presented in the particular case was necessary. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:09 am
The Sprint/Nextel records also showed the phone was “at Griffin's girlfriend's residence in Columbia Heights”, so officers arrested Griffin “at a gas station in Columbia Heights after observing him leave” her residence. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:44 pm
Cribbing now from his abstract: District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:08 pm
Sebelius et al, (downloads as pdf) was filed Thursday in the District Of Columbia District Court by twelve plaintiffs, comprised of individuals and companies. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:11 am
We feel as though the passage of this legislation exceeds the authority granted to the government of New York by its citizens, and violates the Constitution of the United States, ignoring such SCOTUS rulings as District of Columbia v. [read post]
