Search for: "Mark C. Rogers"
Results 161 - 180
of 489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 pm
(IP Finance) Rumour has it that Round Rock’s Micron purchase is reaping big rewards (IAM) Canada Amazon ‘1-click’ heads for the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal (Patentology) (IPblog.ca) Responding to ACTRA: Group calls C-32 a ‘disaster’ and proposes six part fix (Michael Geist) Moral Rights 2.0 (IPOsgoode) Copyright fear mongering hits a new high: Writers groups post their C-32 brief (Michael Geist) Lawful access bills would reshape internet in Canada… [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:24 pm
” Id. at § 1052(c). [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:29 am
The applicant’s primary defense was that its marks were a parody of the Yankees logo and stadium nickname, and therefore were protected by Section 43(c)(3) of the Lanham Act, which provides that: The following shall not be actionable as dilution by blurring . . . any fair use . . . of a famous mark by another person other than as a designation of source for the person’s own goods or services. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:13 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Timothy Rogers v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
By Mark Davidheiser Discovering Culture My interest in this topic stems from events that occurred roughly a decade ago when I was volunteering in the Victim - Offender Reconciliation Program of a Community Mediation Center. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 9:44 am
Rogers), the Palanki trial was held in Sarasota and conducted by visiting Judge Liles C. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:25 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Mark Toliver v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
(TorrentFreak) Australia Media interest suggests that we need to talk about patents (Patentology) Brazil e-marks: preparing for the Madrid Protocol? [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm
Alavida (Part 3) – when can an earlier common-law or unregistered mark can trump a later registered mark? [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
Target (Docket Report) (EDTexweblog.com) Claim amendments in reexamination eliminate patentee’s right to past damages: District Court C D California – Antonious v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:07 pm
Mediavestw.com (Internet Cases) Test your TTAB judge-ability: Are these two design marks for software confusingly similar? [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:46 pm
District Court Judge Mark W. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
(IP finance) Europe Cognac comes of best in spirited attack on Finns: Joined cases C-4/10 and C-27/10 Bureau national interprofessionel du Cognac v Gust. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
The website uses IKEA HACKERS as the website name and as a mark, it does not just refer to IKEA® furniture in the nominative sense. 3) Free speech: Courts have sometimes employed the Rogers v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 5:48 pm
” (See Roger C. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Lords of All the World: Ideologues of Empire in Spain, Britain and France c.1500-1800. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 8:21 pm
Pomroy, John Powers, John Joseph Profenno, Thomas C. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 9:35 am
Benton Christopher Michael Wade Joseph Martin Stephens Christopher II X César Agusto Lozada Rickey Ivan Kanter Stephanie Christine Mohr Robert Edward Coughlin II Mark Siljander James Harutun Batmasian Gary Mark Brugman Joseph Occhipinti Rebekah Kay Charleston Russell Paul Plaisance Lynn Wade Barney Paul L. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
Mark Lewis (@marklewislawyer) [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 9:02 am
by Michael C. [read post]
