Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp."
Results 161 - 179
of 179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2009, 6:18 am
In McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:50 pm
McDonnell Douglas, White v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:12 am
Where a plaintiff cannot produce direct evidence of an employer's discriminatory intent, the plaintiff may prove his case with circumstantial evidence under the burden-shifting scheme of proof established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 148 F.3d 347, 351 (4th Cir. 1998). [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
The plaintiff bears the initial burden of presenting a prima facie case and must show he or she is a member of a protected class, was qualified for his job, suffered an adverse employment action, and that others not in the protected class were treated more favorably [McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 5:29 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Concurrent Tech Corp., No. 08-2370 (3d Cir. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:12 pm
In a case of first-impression, the Sixth Circuit held that the burden-shifting framework (commonly referred to as the McDonnell Douglas/Burdine test) used in cases brought under Title VII does not apply to Title VII mixed-motive cases. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:28 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp., decided last week, the 6th Circuit finally weighed in on this issue: The McDonnell Douglas / Burdine burden-shifting framework does not apply to the summary judgment analysis of Title VII mixed-motive claims. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:49 am
McDonnell Douglas, 468 F.Supp. 521 (D.Ariz.1979). [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:18 am
The decision, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 6:27 pm
” In it, I outline the basics of proving discrimination through disparate treatment evidence, discussing McDonnell-Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
The district court dismissed the Lindsays' complaint, concluding that they failed to plead facts establishing each element of a prima facie case as set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 12:33 pm
” See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 3:45 pm
In 1996, the Employer acquired Rockwell International and in 1997, merged with McDonnell Douglas. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:22 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 211 F.3d 457, 460-61 (8th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 929, 121 S.Ct. 309, 148 L.Ed.2d 248 (2000) ("It remains the law in this Circuit that 'relief under Rule 60(b)(1) for judicial error other than for judicial inadvertence' is not available. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 12:34 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 211 F.3d 457, 463 (8th Cir.2000), but even without a satisfactory explanation, relief may be required where other equitable considerations weigh strongly in favor of setting aside the default judgment. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 3:20 pm
Although the burden shifted to the defendant under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 1:42 pm
The First holds that merely being excluded from the management decisions is not enough under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
