Search for: "Neville v. Neville" Results 161 - 180 of 300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2015, 1:27 am by John Enser
This Blogger, having been out of the UK for a short time, has returned somewhat surprised by how much the outgoing UK government has had to say about copyright in the last few weeks and thought that a round-up might be worthwhile.It started off with the first published speech by the new IP Minister, Baroness (Lucy) Neville-Rolfe at an event called the "Intellectual Property Annual Seminar Mentor Dinner" (no, me neither) on 8 January, which you can read in full here. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am by Rosalind English
 The following summary is based on the Strasbourg Court’s press release: The applicants, Douglas Gary Vinter, Jeremy Neville Bamber and Peter Howard Moore, are British nationals who were born in 1969, 1961 and 1946 respectively. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:49 pm by Sarah Ralph and Alessandra Moussa
Key Takeaways The decision by the AAT should be seen in the context of the decision of Judge Neville in the Federal Circuit Court in Banerji v Bowles [2013] FCCA 1052, which was an application by Ms Banjerji for an interlocutory injunction to stop her employment being terminated by the department for the tweeting conduct. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:40 am by WSLL
James, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Plaintiff): V. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” Next up is Lightfoot v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
Neville, York University – Department of Communications. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am by INFORRM
Outside Parliament, Neville Thurlbeck revealed the existence of his personal dossier of evidence that he claims News International ignored in 2009. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 11:59 am
Neville Cox (who taught me defamation law seven years ago!) [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:01 am by WSLL
Klosterman of Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, P.C., Casper, WyomingRepresenting Appellee: Peter J. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:48 am by emagraken
  Liability will only attach under the doctrine if the three conditions set forth in the Neville decision have been satisfied. [read post]