Search for: "PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT" Results 161 - 180 of 75,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 4:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff engaged defendants to provide professional services in connection with said loan and asked defendants to draft a loan in the form of a Demand Note. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In an unusual submission by a purported “nominal defendant” behaving in a most non-nominal manner, Dial’s counsel called the motion “ridiculous,” plaintiffs’ counsel “delusional,” and wrote that “most of the shareholders that supposedly are seeking to intervene in this action are wives of the Plaintiffs herein, defendants in the 2015 action . . . and their wives, and the rest are either close friends or direct… [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am by Stuart Kaplow
Last year, the state court ruled in favor of the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:39 am by David Adelstein
In other words, a plaintiff wants to hold a defendant liable for the injuries caused by the defendant’s independent contractor. [read post]
This time, the plaintiff filed a Schedule A trademark infringement case against a number of defendants in the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:57 pm by Aaron Moss
” Generally, a cause of action accrues and the statute begins to run when a defendant commits an act that injures a plaintiff. [read post]
The defendants accepted the Eleventh Circuit’s discovery rule and argued that the plaintiffs could sue but could not recover damages beyond the three-year time limit. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s opposition, as will be discussed below, does little if anything to refute this argument; instead, plaintiff essentially contends that it is premature to dismiss her claim pre-answer since no discovery has been taken and plaintiff is allegedly not in possession of her entire file from defendants. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:55 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Defendant CBP has failed to abide by FOIA’s statutory deadlines with respect to Plaintiffs’ request concerning the implementation of the CBP One application and its impact on asylum seekers with disabilities. [read post]