Search for: "Powers v. Social Security Administration"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2019, 9:06 pm
Commissioner of Social Security are simple. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
Compounding that error, the district court crafted its injunction to apply to myriad high-ranking officials in the Biden administration, raising grave separation of powers concerns. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
The CSC system, then, does not displace the power of law, rules, norms, and the like to describe behavior expectations, but it transforms implementation by disconnecting the specific misconduct with a related punishment. [read post]
We (Buchanan and Dorf) Aren't the Ones Saying the President Should "Invoke" the Fourteenth Amendment
6 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
At most what they have shown is that if the President decides to prioritize paying bondholders while stiffing Social Security recipients, he will not thereby violate the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:51 am
Administration is also considering policies, such as export controls on hacking tools. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:50 pm
The High Court also ruled that the action of the University was administratively unreasonable. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 6:13 pm
This notion of “neutrality” ignores the fact that while married same-sex couples pay their full share of income and social security taxes, they are prevented by DOMA from receiving the corresponding same benefits that married heterosexual taxpayers receive. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 5:28 am
See American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm
They exercise enormous power over the economic and social life of the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:10 pm
In a news conference with Polish President Andrejz Duda, Trump reaffirmed the U.S. commitment to its NATO obligations, including the Article V obligation to mutual security assurance. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 5:15 am
Jack also considered the Vesting Clause, which “confers all traditionally executive foreign relations powers not specifically allocated elsewhere,” as it appears throughout the Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am
The security officers are alert, but do not seem especially tense. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 10:23 pm
The first of the two non-SEP cases (337-TA-1300) has been assigned to ALJ MaryJoan McNamara, who like ALJ Shaw has a social-security background, and was appointed four years after him. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
The last point reveals that neither their national security nor their criminal justice systems is at risk of collapsing due to the increasing “civilianization” of military justice. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:00 pm
Last week, Ingrid Wuerth flagged Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
Power Differential Between Government and Social Media Companies Jaffer distinguished large and powerful social media companies from smaller, less sophisticated entities, for example, a local LGBTQ bookstore that has an expressive interest that social media companies do not necessarily have. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:22 am
GREENWAY v. [read post]
