Search for: "R.C."
Results 161 - 180
of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
LOWRY - Leagle.com 1} Defendant-appellant, Harvey Lowry, a Tier II sex offender, appeals his conviction in the Fayette County Court of Common Pleas for failure to register a change of address in violation of R.C. 2950.05(F)(1). 2} Appellant was convicted in 2004 of unlawful sexual conduct with a minor and was sentenced to prison. [read post]
25 May 2016, 11:28 am
As I posted here, after the Supreme Court of Ohio reversed and remanded this case to apply the punitive damages cap in R.C. 2315.21(D)(2)(a) to the two million dollar punitive damages judgment, arguing began in earnest over the amount and the distribution of the punitive damages. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:11 am
Until the General Assembly passes legislation clarifying whether interpretations of “disability” under R.C. 4112 are supposed to mirror the ADA, companies doing business in Ohio would be best served following the most expansive interpretation of the definition of disability possible under either statute. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 7:12 am
The Ohio Department of Taxation (“Department”) recently published an Information Release concerning the Ohio sales and use tax exemption under R.C. 5739.02(B)(27) for persons licensed to conduct food service operations. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:41 am
In a decision released on July 7, 2011, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled 6-1 that because aggravation of a preexisting medical condition is a type of causation, it is not a separate condition or distinct injury as defined by R.C. 4123.01, and a claimant can present evidence on any theory of causation for a medical condition that already has been addressed administratively.The case, Starkey v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 12:33 pm
The trial court has allowed Beckett to bring suit under the dog bite statute, R.C. 955.28. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 6:47 am
Batista was indicted for felonious assault in violation of R.C. 2903.11(B)(1). [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 6:18 am
House then filed an amended complaint solely alleging wrongful termination in violation of R.C. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:21 am
EPA determined that R.C. 3750.081 does not supersede the reporting requirements of EPCRA. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
“Harmonizing the provisions of the [Marketable Title Act] with the recording statutes contained in R.C. [read post]
2 May 2019, 6:27 am
The changes between R.C. 3107.07(A) and its predecessor, R.C. 3107.06(B)(4), demonstrate the General Assembly’s intent. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 6:42 am
At issue in the case is whether R.C. 2305.23, Ohio’s Good Samaritan statute, provides immunity to a lay person attempting to provide emergency assistance to an injured party at the scene of an accident. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:55 am
“If we say 109 (R.C. 109.78(D)) doesn’t apply, then do we allow non-law enforcement personnel to carry a weapon, hoping they do the right thing with it? [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 4:11 pm
The Supreme Court of Ohio held today that when land in a township has been annexed by an adjacent municipality through an “expedited type-2” annexation pursuant to R.C. 709.023, although the annexed property remains a part of the township and remains “subject to the township’s real property taxes,” the municipality may adopt a tax-increment financing plan (TIF) that temporarily exempts from city and township property taxes a portion of the improvements made to… [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 5:46 pm
View the article here 11/2008 Ohio's first sex offender registration statute was enacted in 1963 at former R.C. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:36 am
At issue in this case is whether R.C. 2909.15(D)(2)(b) unconstitutionally violates the separation of powers doctrine. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 2:00 pm
After over 25 years of proposals and negotiations among key stakeholders—including Ohio employers and their supporting associations, the Ohio plaintiffs’ employment law bar, and various employee-rights advocates—on December 22, 2020, the Ohio General Assembly passed sweeping reforms to the state’s employment discrimination statute, R.C. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 6:24 am
Bean’s primary argument against application of the Ohio CAT is that the bright-line nexus standard in R.C. 5751.01(H)(3) violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am
The Tenth District read ambiguity into R.C. 4117.13(D) where none exits. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 10:40 am
”) R.C. 1345.02 (No supplier shall commit an unfair or deceptive act or practice in connection with a consumer transaction. [read post]
