Search for: "Religious Dept."
Results 161 - 180
of 299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2019, 4:53 pm
According to the details of the case, the trial court gave excessive weight to the religious upbringing clause in the case, rather than focusing exclusively on the children’s best interests. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Slip Op. 05736 (1st Dept., 2018), a support proceeding, the Appellate Division held that Family Court erred in determining that the Children’s Law Center (CLC) which had been appointed as attorney for the child with no limitations on the scope of its representation did not have standing to file objections in Family Court. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Slip Op. 05736 (1st Dept., 2018), a support proceeding, the Appellate Division held that Family Court erred in determining that the Children’s Law Center (CLC) which had been appointed as attorney for the child with no limitations on the scope of its representation did not have standing to file objections in Family Court. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 8:07 am
I can see 5 Supreme Court justices siding with him: his position gave ample reason to not even get to the question of religious animus. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 8:59 am
Dept. of Employment Security (.pdf)) found that the First Amendment protects, in an unemployment compensation decision, an employee terminated by a private employer for his speech. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:56 pm
The first amendment, however, does not necessarily confer to religious organizations immunity from liability arising from tortious conduct. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 8:59 am
Dept. of Employment Security (.pdf)) found that the First Amendment protects, in an unemployment compensation decision, an employee terminated by a private employer for his speech. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
Slip Op. 00170(2d Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that the father was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
Slip Op. 00170(2d Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that the father was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:57 am
Montana Dept. of Revenue The biggest religious case of the term involves whether states can be forced to use taxpayer funds to support religious schools. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
New York City Dept of Health & Mental Hygiene that the informed consent regulation is specific to the ultra-Orthodox and therefore, must be subject to strict scrutiny under the Free Exercise Clause. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
They work in the same locations, attend meetings, share lunch rooms, participate in professional events, interact in social, political, religious, and charitable activities, exercise at gyms, and fly on airplanes together to faraway seminars and business trips. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:29 pm
Today’s opinion by Justice Thomas in Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:13 am
The Court agrees (see Rodriguez v New York City Housing Authority, 304 AD2d 468, 469 [lst Dept 2003]), and also rejects Hand‘s affidavit as wholly inappropriate. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 1:48 pm
The Dept. of Labor stated it would issue further guidance clarifying said exemption in April. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 10:04 pm
Tolkin; Umberto Eco; Eric… New political views Liberal New religious views Refiorm Jewish agnostic secular humanist New home town Washington, D.C. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 7:59 am
New York City Dept of Educ 779 F.Supp.2d 289, 56 IDELR 228 (E.D.N.Y. 4/25/2011). [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 11:43 am
Bockover, now a philosophy professor at Humboldt State University in norther California), the first graduate student from outside the Philosophy Dept. chosen to be a TA (I was downstairs in Religious Studies), owing to a recommendation (solicited by Fingarette) from Ninian Smart (whom I miss dearly), a fact I remain perversely proud of. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:37 am
New York City Dept of Educ 779 F.Supp.2d 289, 56 IDELR 228 (E.D.N.Y. 4/25/2011). [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, the Court of Appeals, quoting Matter of Fink v Lefkowitz, 47 NY2d 567, said that "To promote open government and public accountability, FOIL* imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public. [read post]
