Search for: "Results Advertising, LLC" Results 161 - 180 of 2,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2023, 8:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
CasperLabs, LLC, 2023 WL 2415262, No. 21-CV-474 TWR (AHG) (S.D. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:28 am by DONALD SCARINCI
 The plaintiffs also claim that Google placed paid advertisements in proximity to ISIS-created content and shared the resulting ad revenue with ISIS. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
As a result, it was wrong to find no serious harm to Mr Banks’ reputation. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:03 am by Chris Dreyer
It can amplify those results and minimize your risks. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:12 am by David Oxenford and Robert Primosch
The FCC’s Media Bureau designated for evidentiary hearing a series of applications that, if granted, would transfer control of TEGNA Inc. to SGCI Holdings III LLC. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 2:25 pm by Lauren Aversa
  You should have a trademark search done by a professional company and the results reviewed by an attorney. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:01 pm by Marina Wilson
Glasheen, Valles & Inderman Injury Lawyers The Texas law firm of Glasheen, Valles & Inderman took the opportunity to use Super Bowl advertising time to showcase its satisfied clients and positive results in its commercial. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 2:52 pm by Dennis Crouch
RPS Holdings LLC, 5:21-cv-00416 (E.D.N.C. 2023) involves a set of thirteen different professional models whose images were allegedly used without their permission to advertise for the Capital Cabaret, a strip club halfway between Raleigh & Durham, North Carolina. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm by Patricia Salkin
Charlestown Township, a municipality in Chester County, enacted a zoning ordinance that permits outdoor, off-premises advertising signs in a particular district. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
The applicant alleges that the respondent published material defamatory of her by way of providing as search results on google.com and google.com.au two URLs to a third-party website, referred to as RoR1 and RoR2, and three associated search result snippets. [read post]
The FTC unanimously approved a consent order this week requiring Credit Karma, LLC to pay $3 million dollars for allegedly advertising to consumers that they were “pre-approved” for credit card offers, when in reality, the customers were not pre-approved, and in fact, were frequently rejected. [read post]