Search for: "Seagate" Results 161 - 180 of 571
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2013, 7:48 am by Pilar G. Kraman
Regardless, Judge Robinson found that plaintiffs' claims were not fuitle after analyzing the claims under In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm by Jason Stiehl
Compaq and Seagate litigation involves a dispute between MIT, the owner of intellectual property related to signal haping technology, and Compaq and Seagate. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
., Seagate Technology, LLC., and Seagate Technology, Inc. did not misappropriate 11 of 15 alleged trade secrets from Convolve, Inc. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:46 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Convolve gave two other presentations to Compaq and Seagate, on February 10 and April 7, 1999. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:36 pm by Samantha G. Wilson
The Court also ruled that summary judgment on willfulness was appropriate, as “this court and the Federal Circuit have held the state of mind of the accused infringer is not relevant” to the objective prong of Seagate. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 10:03 am by Docket Navigator
The partial success of its invalidity defenses lend credibility to the reasonableness of [defendant's] actions which defeats the objective prong of Seagate." [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:46 pm by Docket Navigator
"The problem with the Defendant's Motion is that it seems to assume that by simply stating and presenting its defenses it has met its summary judgment burden of negating the existence of the objective prong of the [In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 11:38 pm by Jeff Richardson
South Carolina attorney Bill Latham of the Hytech Lawyer reviews the Seagate GoFlex Mobile Wireless Plus 1TB mobile drive, a wireless hard drive that you can use with an iPad. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:11 pm by Dennis Crouch
., 549 U.S. 118 (2007) In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 6:48 am by Dennis Crouch
Seagate was apparently happy to provide that document to be used against its market competitor. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:00 pm by Joe Mullin
At trial, Marvell hotly contested that CMU had invented anything new; they argued that a Seagate patent, filed 14 months earlier, describes everything in CMU's invention. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 4:31 am
The jury foreperson had not disclosed that he was sued by his former employer, Seagate, in 1993 and that he had filed for personal bankruptcy six months after he was sued by Seagate. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:00 pm by Joe Mullin
Hogan’s undisclosed Seagate litigation, including whether it knew of Mr. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:34 am by stevehansen
  Since then, cases such as Knorr-Bremse and Seagate have greatly diminished the impact of not obtaining an opinion on the issue of willfulness. [read post]