Search for: "Smith & Nephew, Inc. "
Results 161 - 180
of 353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
.* Smith & Nephew seek to go to the Supreme Court and EPO proceedings continue - the war is not overAfter many posts on Smith & Nephew v Convatec (Court of Appeal judgment here, here, and here; first instance judgment of Mr Justice Birss here), Neil covers the last episodes of the series, both in the UK and in Eponia.* Best thing since sliced bread -- or even better? [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:29 am
DePuy ASR, DePuy Pinnacle, Biomet Magnum, Smith and Nephew, Wright Conserve, Zimmer Durom cup and Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II, are among hip replacements that continue to fail prematurely and require painful and risky revision surgery. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:50 am
On 18 February 2011 Smith & Nephew filed a notice of opposition. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., Civil Action No. 14-1507-SLR (D.Del., July 23, 2015), the Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike a number of the paragraphs of the affirmative defenses and counterclaims contained in Defendant’s Answer that referred to a disciplinary action taken by the Medical Board of California against the inventor of the patent-in-suit concerning the billing practices in her physician practice more than a decade after the issuance of the… [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 54 [week ending on Sunday 5 July] - Google v Oracle and Microsoft/Kyocera settlement | GC and Nagoya | Life Science IP Summit 2015 | (Kat)onomics of patents | Case T-15/13 Group Nivelles v OHIM | Case T‑521/13 Alpinestars Research Srl v OHIM v Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Multi Time… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
Once again this is a factor which undermines Smith & Nephew's favoured interpretation of the claim. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 52 [week ending on Sunday 14 June] - EU TM reform | Motivate Publishing FZ LLC and another v Hello Ltd | EPO’s Inventor of the Year: poll results | New network for new IP people | Delfi v Estonia | UPC fees | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Canary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , then allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
Convatec counterclaimed that Smith & Nephew’s Durafiber product would infringe the patent. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
In "The wounded patent survived, was only just infringed, but no injunction", here, fellow Kat Darren wrote about the decision of Birss J in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc [2013] EWHC 3955 (Pat), a technically detailed case which amused Merpel, who commented that a case that started off being basically about chemistry ended up being basically about mathematics. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Medtronic, Inc., ___ F. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
Plaintiffs Smith & Nephew, Inc. and John Hayhurst (collectively "S&N") had appealed the district court's decision to grant Arthrex's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
26 May 2015, 11:46 am
Eric Harris, Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:06 am
" Smith & Nephew Incorporated, et al v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:13 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2015 U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2015 U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 10:04 am
Grabowski and her husband sued the manufacturer of the artificial knee, Smith & Nephew, Inc., and the sales representative who gave the surgeon the incorrect part, Daniel Forrest. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 6:08 am
Smith & Nephew, which started the MoM craze with its Birmingham line of MoM devices is also under the gun as well as Wright’s line of Conserve MoM hip implants. [read post]
