Search for: "Smith v. Smith & Nephew, Inc."
Results 161 - 180
of 296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
There's definitely something wrong ...The IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 relating to silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here, and this Kat here). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 52 [week ending on Sunday 14 June] - EU TM reform | Motivate Publishing FZ LLC and another v Hello Ltd | EPO’s Inventor of the Year: poll results | New network for new IP people | Delfi v Estonia | UPC fees | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Canary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , then allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
On 24 June, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v Convatec Technologies Inc & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 607, an appeal of Birss J’s 2013 High Court judgment (reported by the IPKat amid New Year frivolities here), which can be read on BAILII.The patent in suit was EP (UK) 1 343 510 in the name of ConvaTec, a patent for a light-stabilized silverisation of gel forming fibres in the context of an antimicrobial component of a… [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
In "The wounded patent survived, was only just infringed, but no injunction", here, fellow Kat Darren wrote about the decision of Birss J in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc [2013] EWHC 3955 (Pat), a technically detailed case which amused Merpel, who commented that a case that started off being basically about chemistry ended up being basically about mathematics. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Medtronic, Inc., ___ F. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
Plaintiffs Smith & Nephew, Inc. and John Hayhurst (collectively "S&N") had appealed the district court's decision to grant Arthrex's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
26 May 2015, 11:46 am
Eric Harris, Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:06 am
" Smith & Nephew Incorporated, et al v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:13 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2015 U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2015 U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 6:08 am
Smith & Nephew, which started the MoM craze with its Birmingham line of MoM devices is also under the gun as well as Wright’s line of Conserve MoM hip implants. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 11:38 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 14-433, 2014 La. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2013 WL 6504427, at *2 (N.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 11:30 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2104 U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:30 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Smith & Nephew, 2005 WL 3470337, at *5 (M.D. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:34 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:13 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2013 WL 6157587 at *3-*4 (S.D. [read post]
