Search for: "Steven Mauro" Results 161 - 180 of 358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2011, 4:51 pm by david
Other commentators who have written on the Court’s action include Tony Mauro, Matt Miller, and Joan Biskupic. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:19 pm by Randy Barnett
Congratulations to my colleagues, Executive Director Irv Gornstein, Deputy Director (and former Ginsburg clerk) Dori Bernstein, and Faculty Directors Steven Goldblatt & Cornelia Pillard for a marvelous event and a wonderful year. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:55 pm
In yesterday's Post, HealthDay reporter Steven Reinberg had this story on the Court's ruling and its medical implications. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:41 pm by Kalvis Golde
Early commentary comes from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg; Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog; Jay Michaelson at the Daily Beast; David French at National Review; Quin Hillyer in an op-ed for the Washington Examiner; Jonathan Adler at The Volokh Conspiracy; Lisa Soronen at the Council of State Governments’ blog; and Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:27 am
As always, Tony Mauro has been up to the challenge, producing excellent copy on Twitter, his blog and in the Legal Times. [read post]
30 May 2007, 7:33 am
And Steven Greenhouse reports that "Experts Say Decision on Pay Reorders Legal Landscape. [read post]
24 May 2007, 5:46 pm
Tony Mauro has this post at The BLT highlighting this article, published in the Michigan Law Review, in which Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Boyce Martin Jr. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 6:12 pm
Tony Mauro has the story today on the Legal Times Web site. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 2:27 pm
Tony Mauro reports here at The BLT on the Court's decision and Justice Kennedy's crucial vote. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:55 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports that retired Justice John Paul Stevens “criticized Major League Baseball’s antitrust exemption in a speech last week that came as the high court prepares to review a challenge to the immunity. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:55 am by Amy Howe
  Mauro also covers the four-to-four affirmance in Hawkins v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Chatman, holding by a vote of seven to one that the Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision that the defendant failed to show purposeful race discrimination in the selection of his jury was clearly erroneous, comes from Tony Mauro of Supreme Court Brief (subscription or registration required); commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Janell Ross for The Washington Post, Steven Mazie in The Economist, and Garrett Epps in The Atlantic. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 5:51 am by Amy Howe
Circuit, while in The National Law Journal Tony Mauro looks at possible nominees more broadly. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:29 am by Amy Howe
” In the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Mauro reports that the Court “took note of a rare occurrence on Monday: a confession of error by the solicitor general. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Jay Willis
” Ashby Jones at the WSJ Law Blog recaps recent speculation on the possible retirement of Justice Stevens and the selection of his potential replacements. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At the Blog of Legal Times, Tony Mauro reports that “Justices of the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional reporting on the research comes from Tony Mauro and Vanessa Blum at The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required). [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic, Steven Vladeck argues that “[i]f the Court embraces the government’s position in Dalmazzi v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:59 am by Amy Howe
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie weighs in on last week’s ruling in Evenwel v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At his eponymous blog, Lyle Denniston covers a recent speech by retired Justice John Paul Stevens, in which Stevens suggested that the U.S. government should “pay something akin to ‘reparations’” to individuals “mistreated or abused by anti-terrorist policies. [read post]