Search for: "Time Warner Inc." Results 161 - 180 of 1,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2016, 6:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, in a notice filed with Google on behalf of Warner Brothers by Vobile Inc., several legitimate sites were included including several pages. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 10:55 am
In my recent paper, currently in the submission process, Treasury Inc.: How the Bailout Reshapes Corporate Theory and Practice, I explore the implications of the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:16 am by Ken Davidson
Below are the links to the companies’ settlement agreements, supporting exhibits, and the NY AG press releases: UMG Recordings, Inc: Settlement (pdf), Exhibits (pdf) Press Release EMI Group: Settlement (pdf), Exhibits (pdf), Press Release Sony BMG Music Entertainment: Settlement (pdf), Exhibits (pdf), Press Release Warner Music Group: Settlement and Exhibits (pdf), Press Release [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:33 am by Jani Ihalainen
No repayment of license fees was discussed by judge King; a point that might be contested in court some time in the future. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 5:15 am
 AOL/Time Warner, 452 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir. 2006), the one circuit case to find that vendors could be liable under Rule 10b-5. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
AOL/Time Warner, 452 F.3d 1040 (2nd Cir. 2006), plaintiffs, shareholders of the defunct company, Homestore.com, alleged that a number of vendors committed fraud by entering into transactions that enabled Homestore to misstate its revenues. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 5:07 pm
For instance, when the Comcast – NBC Universal deal closes (assuming, of course, that it does), Comcast will control a cable system, a broadcast network, and multiple cable channels, whereas Time Warner Cable is a cable system only (that’s because Time Warner Inc. spun off TWC) and Fox’s parent, News Corp., lacks a cable system. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
The first wave of defense briefing is now complete in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 9:21 am
The district court explained that the "recently produced emails involve communications from 2007 between in-house counsel for Comcast, Cox, and Time Warner Cable, and attorneys from the law firm of Dreier, LLP. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 8:29 pm by Nerds in Court
” On appeal, Asylum argued that the Plaintiffs Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc., New Line Productions Inc., Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc., Saul Zentz Company, and New Line Cinema, LLC’s (the Studios) were unlikely to succeed on their trademark infringement claim regarding the term “Hobbit. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 8:29 pm by Nerds in Court
” On appeal, Asylum argued that the Plaintiffs Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc., New Line Productions Inc., Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc., Saul Zentz Company, and New Line Cinema, LLC’s (the Studios) were unlikely to succeed on their trademark infringement claim regarding the term “Hobbit. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 9:01 am by Matthew Savage Aibel
Infosys, an IT services company, bid on a job from Time Warner Cable (“TWC”) that had been serviced by a competitor, Acclaim. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 9:01 am by Matthew Savage Aibel
Infosys, an IT services company, bid on a job from Time Warner Cable (“TWC”) that had been serviced by a competitor, Acclaim. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 9:01 am by Matthew Savage Aibel
Infosys, an IT services company, bid on a job from Time Warner Cable (“TWC”) that had been serviced by a competitor, Acclaim. [read post]