Search for: "US v. Woodward" Results 161 - 180 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
  He relied on the English decision in Woodward v Hutchins ([1977] 1 WLR 760). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am by Vincent LoTempio
Stephanie Woodward, Transportation Systems Advocate commemorates this in a nice Center for Disability Rights blog post  A Short History of Justin Dart, Jr., “Father” of the ADA. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:18 am by lsammis
Consider the ruling in a 1985 UK case, Lion Laboratories v Evans, [1984] 2 All ER 417, [1985] QB 526. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
That might be so at the interlocutory stage in an attempt to avoid the rule in Bonnard v Perryman: a matter, it will be recalled that exercised this court in Woodward v Hutchins. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:54 am
"The Appellate Division said that test to be used in considering complaints involving alleged out-of-title work is whether "the record as a whole provides a rational basis for the determination that the duties [the employee] performed were 'substantially similar' to those detailed in his job description and that he was not performing out-of-title work. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm by Christopher Simon
Bottom line; if the foreign object is no big deal, deal with it using a yelp or kudzu review. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:00 am by Michael Scutt
  The recent case of Woodward v Santander [2010] UKEAT 0250_09_2505 was a case in point and provided a reminder that it won’t protect all communications hiding behind it. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
” A shortage in one of the key drugs used for lethal injections, has lead to some interesting new challenges, see, e.g. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:21 am by Andrew Frisch
However, Woodward uses the warranty and indemnification clauses of the 2007 contract in an attempt to hold Oliverios liable for Woodward’s failure to pay McDougal FLSA wages after July 17, 2007. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:22 am by INFORRM
  The then Lord Justice Neuberger was one the Court of Appeal judges in the seminal 2005 privacy decision in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:14 pm
  "Substantial connection" was also used to describe this idea in  R. v. [read post]