Search for: "Unknown Defendants DOES 1-20" Results 161 - 180 of 478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
App. 2005). 1 The City appealed the original jury verdict, and the case was heard by the Court of Appeals of Ohio inHilliard v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Darius joined Ackerman Ackerman & Dynkowski shortly after graduating, and he has been avidly defending landowners throughout the country from more than 13 years. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
(The matter involved charges against nine defendants for participating in a previously disclosed scheme to hack into the SEC’s EDGAR system and extract nonpublic information to use for illegal trading.) [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 7:34 am by Dan Harris
The only relevant portion of your employment contract is the Chinese portion and if you do not speak Chinese you have no clue what it says and, most importantly, you have no clue whether the English language portion accurately translates the Chinese portion (I can tell you right now that the odds are about 100 to 1 that it doesn’t). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I have set out below the Top Ten D&O Stories of 2018, with an eye toward future possibilities. 1. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 8:49 am by Kathleen Claussen
To the extent it limits Canada’s rights, how far does that stretch? [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Litigation frequently involves diseases or outcomes with unknown causes, and so the reality of unidentified residual confounders is unavoidable. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:04 pm by Alexander Berengaut and Tarek Austin
Does 1-59, for example, hackers unlawfully accessed copyrighted materials on a company’s protected website.[5] The company brought suit against the unknown culprits — named “John Does” in the complaint — for violating the CFAA, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the Copyright Act.[6] It then provided the court with the internet protocol addresses of each defendant.[7] The court granted the company’s motion… [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  But suppose instead, a thief, who does not work at Microsoft, breaks into Microsoft headquarters via a basement window at midnight, reads Microsoft’s CFO’s papers about an upcoming positive earnings announcement and then buys Microsoft stock before that announcement. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 2:09 pm
He also testified that the staff took the same steps, but no one was able to identify the infringer (fn. 1). [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:20 am by Cannabis Law Group
If a product is labeled as having .1 percent CBD, 10 percent of .1 allows for practically no margin of error at all. [read post]
It describes extensive interaction between the conspirators and an entity, called “Organization 1,” which the Washington Post and other news outlets have identified as Wikileaks. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:40 am by Chinmayi Sharma
It points to defendant Stone’s secret communications with GRU Operative #1, the original purveyor of DNC documents, and Stone’s bragging about ties to Assange. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm by Andrew Keane Woods
(I am leaving aside for now the potential claims under British and European law, but those add to this list considerably.) 1. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:49 pm by Josh Fensterbush
The FCAA does not elaborate on the requisite degree of commonality between the class members and multiple respondents, and the issue of whether it is necessary for each class member to have a claim against each defendant is currently being expounded in the Australian legal system.[18] Once both sides of a class action litigation can be established, it must also be shown that all the class members’ claims arise from the “same, similar or related circumstances. [read post]