Search for: "Wells County Board of Zoning Appeals"
Results 161 - 180
of 309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
This case presents the following issue: Is the issuance of a well permit pursuant to state groundwater well-drilling standards a discretionary decision subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 1:37 pm
Check out relevant job openings on our Job Board. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
However, the Court of Appeal found that substantial evidence supported the City’s conclusion that the project was not unusual in size compared to other developments that qualified for the infill exemption nor was the project unusual as to the zoning and land use conditions within the vicinity of the project. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
West of counsel), for respondents.Fisher, J.(1) Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Robert J. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
West of counsel), for respondents.Fisher, J.(1) Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Robert J. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
It reasoned that the County’s incorporation by reference of the Department of Water Resources’ “minimum standards of well construction” intended to protect water quality, coupled with language in the local ordinance stating that well permits “shall be issued” if state and County standards are met, precluded the kind of discretion necessary to require compliance with CEQA. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 12:14 pm
Well, that depends. [read post]
16 May 2023, 9:48 am
For example, experienced counsel is often required for appearances before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB), Trademark Trial and Appeals Board (TTAB), Federal Circuit, or the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
County of Ventura v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The City Board of Zoning Adjustment (“Board”) found that the proposed construction qualified for a CEQA Class 3 exemption, which allows for construction of new small structures of up to three single family residences in an urbanized area without environmental review. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The City Board of Zoning Adjustment (“Board”) found that the proposed construction qualified for a CEQA Class 3 exemption, which allows for construction of new small structures of up to three single family residences in an urbanized area without environmental review. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:48 pm
I once appealed a large drug case from Collin County District Court up to the Dallas Court of Appeals. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:23 pm
The City Board of Zoning Adjustment found that the proposed construction qualified for a Class 3 exemption (new construction of small structures.) [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:19 pm
. * * * Even assuming KBJ is correct in its assertion that Indiana Code Section 36-7-4-1010 applies to plan commissions in addition to boards of zoning appeals, this Section only applies to "costs" and does not mention "attorney fees. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2017) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2017) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:40 am
Board of Trustees of California State University (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341, 363.) [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
County of Fresno, S219783 (F066798, 226 Cal.App.4th 704); Fresno County Superior Court; 11CECG00706, 11CECG00709, 11CECG00726.) [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:00 am
The area is within a “very high fire hazard severity zone. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:34 pm
The Board appealed and the Appellate Division affirmed PERC’s determination. [read post]
