Search for: "v. Ball et al"
Results 161 - 180
of 234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
It will simply lead the bidder into making a low-ball tender offer to the shareholders. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:16 am
” However, the example given of actual dissolution measurements uses USP 1. = = = = Dominick Conde of Venable (NY) argued the case for Nalpropion; Jonathan Ball of Greenberg Traurig (NY) argued for Actavis assisted by Justin MacLean, et al. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IP Litigation Blog) New Jersey local patent rules (IP Frontline) US Patents – Decisions CAFC applies KSR – finding combination claims obvious: Ball Aerosol v Limited Brands, Bath & Body Works etc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) CAFC rejects lower court’s ob [read post]
15 May 2009, 12:30 pm
In their First Amended Complaint, available here, the Sierra Club, et al, allege that California has essentially allowed the process for adding chemicals to the Proposition 65 list to grind to a halt. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm
Supremes on Arizona’s illegal immigration SB 1070 in the case known officially as 11-182 Arizona et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:07 am
v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(GRAY On Claims) District Court E D Louisiana: Prior License of asserted patent does not bar imposition of permanent injunction: Innovention Toys, LLC v MGA Entertainment, Inc. et al(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Delay of five to seven years does not create undue prejudice sufficient to deny stay pending reexam: Spectros Corp v Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc (Docket Report) BPAI: Reissue cannot merely add new dependent claims (without cancelling… [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am
Our Canadian labour and employment system in Ontario functions under Collective Bargaining, Common Law, and Employment Standards Act (ESA) regimes. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
Keyes, et al.: in March, Rev. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:10 pm
Antec et al (CAFC 2009-1248, -1249) precedential Summary Judgment Motion Antec wanted a mulligan on its summary judgment motion. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:02 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:02 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
Back on the terra firma of the Patents Court, Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) was asked by Teva et al to provide his judgment in light of the CJEU's decision. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 3:35 am
., ECF No. 109 at 11-12, 15-16, 15 n.21, with Brief of the New York Council of Defense Lawyers et al. as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioner, Brown v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:57 pm
Pension Committee of the Univ. of Montreal Pension Plan, et al., v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:58 am
Walgreens et al (CAFC 2009-1237) precedential Judge DYK penned this opinion, with which Judge Bryson concurred. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
Sorrell, et al., No. 5:14-cv-117, D. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
Sorrell, et al., No. 5:14-cv-117, D. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
The emphasis is therefore on its being a distraction, something that gives pleasure (see ‘Sports Law' by Gardiner et al (Cavendish, 1998). [read post]
