Search for: "v. State of Oklahoma et al" Results 161 - 180 of 263
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Bartlett, et. al., Comment on the Definition of ‘Eligible Organization’ for Purposes of Coverage of Certain Preventive Services under the Affordable Care Act, (October 8, 2014).Alan E. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:57 am by David DePaolo
Oklahoma, Texas, and perhaps New Mexico may not. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
  The opinion involves 68 plaintiffs and the law in 22 states.Here’s a link to the opinion, which is encaptioned In re Darvocet, Darvon, & Propoxyphene Products Liability Litigation, Nos. 12-5368, et al. (6th Cir. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Chamber of Commerce et al v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") released a seminal case that aggressively concludes that the union's constitutional right will prevail over an individual's privacy rights arising out of the Alberta Personal Information Protection Act ("PIPA"): Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta, et al v United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 401. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Oklahoma case is Cline, et al, v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
MishkinIt looks like the court is finally set to rule on the CFPB’s motion to dismiss in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 8:39 am by Thomas Braun
 The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently issued a decision in Illinois Commerce Commission, et al., v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm by Cicely Wilson
Thompson, et al., US 10th Cir. (6/11/13)Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative LawAppellant Keith Cressman objected to the image on the standard Oklahoma license plate. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am by Allison Trzop
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]