Search for: "Hands On Originals, Inc." Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2014, 5:29 am
Here, on the other hand, the allegation upon information and belief does not recite the elements of a claim or make a conclusory statement. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 7:06 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Alicia: you got your hand caught in the cookie jar; I wouldn't suggest the cookie jar does not exist. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
Selikoff, back in 1954, as an expert witness in the “original 17” UNARCO (Union Asbestos and Rubber Co.) asbestos worker claims. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:48 am by Ron Coleman
Tri-Star Pictures Inc., 61 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1930, 1934 (C.D. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am by LTA-Editor
Klinger and the estate of the original creator of Holmes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 4:33 am
 In Smith & Nephew's original Process Description of the relevant experiments, only the theoretical approach was used, resulting in values of 0.96-0.97%, which would infringe. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am by Ron Coleman
Originally published March 19, 2013.The Supreme Court handed down a huge decision in copyright law today, ruling in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:11 am by Terry Hart
As for overzealous enforcement, many copyright owners have found that the bad PR that results from too heavy a hand in sending takedown notices is not worth it.) [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
 Of the nine states that originally signed up with inBloom, only one, New York, is reportedly still using the service. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:25 am by Joy Waltemath
The worker’s job required repetitive hand movements and turning (pronation) of wrists, elbows, and shoulders. [read post]