Search for: ""Atkins v. Virginia" OR "536 U.S. 304""
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 6:56 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 316 (2002), the Supreme Court held that mentally retarded defendants are “less culpable than average criminals” and therefore may not be executed. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:39 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002); Firemen’s Ins. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:14 am
In the landmark case of Atkins v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:02 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), constitutionally exempt from execution. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), the Court held that execution of "mentally retarded" offenders constituted cruel and unusual punishment, and in Thompson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:58 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), section 921.137, Florida Statutes (2009), and Cherry v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:16 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002). [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:14 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), which held that executing the mentally retarded was cruel and inhuman punishment). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002). [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The decision of the United States District Court forthe Middle District of Alabama in McNair v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 9:20 pm
Virginia 536 U.S. 304 (2002) ) we now know the reason the prosecutor's are so angry: Mr. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
In Weems v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
In Weems v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:25 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002). [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 8:01 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), describing the same crime. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 8:01 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), describing the same crime. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:34 pm
in Atkins v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:52 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), and came unexpectedly across a lesson in storytelling. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 9:59 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), that the Eighth Amendment prohibited the execution of mentally retarded offenders, the Court punted all tough administrative issues by leaving to the states "the task of developing appropriate ways to enforce the constitutional restriction upon its execution of sentences. [read post]
