Search for: ""Baker v. Carr" OR "369 U.S. 186"" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
So today my remarks will focus on war powers—specifically the president’s ability to commit the U.S. armed forces into some level of hostilities without congressional authorization. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), it had jurisdiction, that a justiciable case was stated, that Sanders had standing, and that the Democratic primary in Georgia is “state” action within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 266 (1962) (Stewart, J., concurring.) [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 209 (1962), questionswhich the trial court—and, indeed, any court (according to the petitioners)—lacks jurisdiction to entertain. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:53 am by Richard M. Esenberg
Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 215, 82 S.Ct. 691, 709, 7 L.Ed.2d 663 (1962). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 2:20 pm
Carr, 369 U.S. 186, outlined factors indicating the presence of a nonjusticiable political question, according to the appellate court. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:12 am by Sean Wajert
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), to describe the political question doctrine: a lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards for resolving it; or the impossibility of deciding without an initial policy determination of a kind clearly for nonjudicial discretion. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:58 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 217, 218 (1962), CAAF observed that “judicial review of ‘a political question’ is precluded where the Court finds . . . [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 11:48 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 217, 218 (1962); see also Flast v. [read post]