Search for: ""Baker v. Carr" OR "369 U.S. 186""
Results 21 - 26
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2007, 9:31 am
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), to federal congressional districts. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:42 pm
Carr (1962) 369 U.S.186 (Findlaw subscr. req'd) and Vieth v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 10:40 am
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), are themselves divided into jurisdictional and prudential considerations. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 5:04 am
Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 7 L.Ed.2d 663 (1962)), not on whether the result may possibly conflict with that in a hypothetical future lawsuit.Knox Park also argues that its failure to file a claim against Landmark is not fatal because the Federal Rules render cross-claims permissive and because it does not need its own claim, since Scottsdale's complaint sought declarations regarding all parties' rights and duties. [read post]
12 Jun 2006, 4:54 am
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), and, as the Court later said when quoting from the Baker Court’s analysis, ‘[t]he synthesis of that effort is found in the following passage in the Court’s opinion’ (Davis v. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am
Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 210 (1962): ‘The nonjusticiability of a political question is primarily a function of the separation of powers. [read post]
