Search for: ""Basic, Inc. v. Levinson" OR "485 U.S. 224"" Results 21 - 40 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  This past March, the Court decided Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988) as to individual class members[5] by focusing upon large institutional claimants; and (ii) limiting “allowed claims” through set-offs pursuant to § 28(a)’s requirement limiting plaintiffs to “actual damages,”[6] and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act’s (“PSLRA”) damages provision which essentially limits plaintiffs to nominal losses.[7] As to the first category, the… [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988) and (ii) the percentage of cases that make it to summary judgment and trial. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:07 am by Tom Webley
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), presumption of reliance at the class certification stage with evidence of a lack of price impact. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 9:22 am by Steven Hong
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), which relied on the efficient market hypothesis to create the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance on misrepresentations. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), is not perfect, there did not appear to be sufficient support for overruling Basic outright and doing away with a presumption of classwide reliance derived from the fraud-on-the-market theory. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 10:25 am by Barry Barnett
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), to the extent that it recognizes a presumption of classwide reliance derived from the fraud-on-the-market theory. 2. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 10:46 am by Lacey Bangle
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 243-50 (1988), allows a plaintiff seeking class certification to use a rebuttable presumption to establish reliance. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 6:38 am by Bexis
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), to the extent that it recognizes a presumption of classwide reliance derived from the fraud-on-themarket theory." [read post]