Search for: ""California v. Carney" OR "471 U.S. 386""
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2011, 4:34 am
Carney, 471 U.S. 386, 390, 105 S. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:24 am
A couple of years ago, I did a post on a California case in which the California Court of Appeals for the Sixth District held that the owner of an SUV had a 4th Amendment expectation of privacy in the sensing diagnostic module (SDM) of his vehicle. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:45 pm
Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (1985) (internal quotations and citations omitted). [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 2:41 am
Carney, 471 U.S. 386, 105 S.Ct. 20166, 85 L.Ed. 2d 406 (1985). [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 11:32 pm
Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (1985), the Court said that because cars are highly regulated by the states (e.g., licensing, vehicle inspections, etc.), we have a reduced expectation of privacy in automobiles and other vehicles. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (1985); State v. [read post]
