Search for: ""Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp." OR "539 U.S. 23"" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2024, 9:07 am by Dennis Crouch
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), false claims about the inventorship or authorship of a product are not actionable under the Lanham Act. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
The defendants asserted that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 5:37 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), described a false designation of origin claim as occurring “when a producer misrepresents his own goods or services as someone else’s. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 8:39 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003) to find that plaintiff’s Lanham Act claim failed. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:09 pm
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), a claim for reverse passing off cannot be brought to prevent the copying of intellectual property. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 6:00 am by Tucker Chambers
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23, 37 (2003), a business may draw upon an image from the public domain, make it its own, and obtain trademark rights by selling goods or services bearing that image. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:14 am by Dennis Crouch
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003). [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003) and TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:00 pm by Stacia Lay
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), by preventing the Betty Boop character from ever entering the public domain. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:49 am by Sheppard Mullin
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23, 32 (2003), in finding that an author may not use the Lanham Act to protect originality and creativity. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 12:49 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23, 32 (2003), in finding that an author may not use the Lanham Act to protect originality and creativity. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:45 pm by Bruno Tarabichi
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., another case that both parties failed to cite, is also relevant. 539 U.S. 23, 123 S. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:29 pm by Tom Casagrande
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003)—another decision that neither party had cited or discussed. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:21 pm by tlcasagrande
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), holding that the defendant’s knock offs amounted to “reverse passing off” under the Lanham Act. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:39 am by R. David Donoghue
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23, 123 S.Ct. 2041 (2003), decision, the Court held that the defendants were correct in identifying themselves as the originator of their papers, even if plaintiff originated the Model underlying the papers. [read post]