Search for: ""Groh v. Ramirez" OR "540 U.S. 551"" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2016, 5:01 am
United States, 441 U.S. 238 (1979); see also United States v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am by MBettman
Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004)(“[T]he presumptive rule against warrantless searches applies with equal force to searches whose only defect is a lack of particularity in the warrant. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551, 557 (2004) (“The Fourth Amendment by its terms requires particularity in the warrant, not in the supporting documents. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:01 am
Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551, 557-58 (2004), it would still constitute an unconstitutional general warrant. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 2:58 am by SHG
Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004), cannot be cured by reference to unincorporated, unattached supporting documents, we conclude that the district court correctly refused to exclude the resulting evidence, and therefore AFFIRM. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 12:05 pm
Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551, 563 (2004) ("Having concluded that a constitutional violation occurred, we turn to the question whether petitioner is entitled to qualified immunity despite that violation. [read post]