Search for: ""Indianapolis v. Edmond" OR "531 U.S. 32""
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2021, 12:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:08 am
SEC civil disgorgement order is not a criminal penalty within the meaning of the Double Jeopardy Clause U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Chalking Is Not a Search Under the Fourth Amendment The Sixth Circuit relied on United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:13 pm
Bd. of Education, 347 U.S. 483 873 (1954); Strauder v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 9:12 am
Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000); State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 12:29 pm
Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000)], and t Continue Reading The post What do I have to do at a checkpoint? [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:49 pm
Edmond, 531 U.S. 32, 47-48 (2000). [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
Edmond, 531 U.S. 32, 47-48 (2000). [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:31 am
Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:53 am
Edmond, 531 U.S. 32, 40-42 (2000), Delaware v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:42 am
Edmond, 531 U.S. 32, 2000) and by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (Lujan vs. [read post]
26 May 2012, 5:32 am
And in Indianapolis v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:36 am
Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000). [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:51 am
City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:19 am
City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:20 am
Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000). [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 12:20 pm
Edmond, 531 U.S. 32, 41 (2000). [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 12:20 pm
Edmond, 531 U.S. 32, 41 (2000). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 7:23 am
Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000), wherein the Court noted that it has “never approved a checkpoint program whose primary purpose was to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing. [read post]
