Search for: ""Maryland v. Craig" OR "497 U.S. 836"" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Bruen challenge to sentencing enhancement for being an unlawful user of controlled substances was not plain error U.S. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 5:20 pm by Russell Knight
Craig, 497 U.S. 836, 857 (1990) But, is questioning a witness via Zoom enough? [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 8:12 am by Ian Mance
Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990), that remote testimony violates a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation unless the State meets a demanding two-part test for necessity and reliability. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:35 am by Frank Heft
Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990) and 18 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 12:18 pm
Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990), which allowed a prosecutor in some circumstances to present the testimony of a child by electronic transmission from a place outside the physical presence of the accused. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 6:51 am
Craig497 U.S. 836 (1990), the United States Supreme Court held that while `the Confrontation Clause reflects a preference for face-to-face confrontation at trial,’ that `preference must occasionally give way to considerations of public policy and the necessities of the case. [read post]
25 May 2012, 2:12 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
  The Michigan Court of Appeals remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing to determine (1) whether there was “good cause” to use video testimony as MCR 6.006(C) requires; and (2) whether the video testimony was “necessary to further an important public policy” under Maryland v Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990). [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by B.W. Barnett
Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990)), I have to wonder if this "interrogatory"  alternative (Section 2(b) above) to cross-examination is what the Supreme Court meant by "meaningful and effective cross-examination. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 12:06 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990), remains good law after Crawford – an interesting question that will have to be resolved by the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:36 pm
Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990) and made it violative of an accused's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation when an accused does not meet his accuser face-to-face at trial. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 12:16 pm
Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990):IN LIGHT OF CRAWFORD v. [read post]