Search for: ""MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc." OR "549 U.S. 118"" Results 41 - 60 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118, 127 (2007). [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:37 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
Genentech Inc., 549 U.S. 118 (2007), which lowered the standard for bringing declaratory judgment actions. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:06 pm
" 549 U.S. 118, 132 n.11 (2007); see also ABB Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:34 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
549 U.S. 118, 132 n.11 (2007); see also ABB Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118 (2007) (holding that declaratory judgment (“DJ”) jurisdiction may exist even if the patent holder could not have sued the DJ plaintiff for infringement; apprehension that patentee will sue for infringement is not a necessary element for Article III jurisdiction);  ·       Solidify our understanding of the scope of patentable subject matter available for business method… [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118 (2007) (holding that declaratory judgment jurisdiction may exist even if the patent holder could not have sued for infringement and that the apprehension that patentee will sue for infringement is not a necessary element for Article III jurisdiction); Bilski v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 1:19 pm
Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118, 127 (2007) (quoting Aetna Life Ins. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:30 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118 (2007).The district court had denied DJ: the district court observed that the mere existence of an adversely held patent does not suffice to establish adverse legal interests, and that the circumstances cited by ITI did not establish declaratory jurisdiction at the time the complaint was filed. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118, 127 (2007). [read post]