Search for: ""Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr" OR "518 U.S. 470""
Results 21 - 40
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2012, 1:58 pm
In Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 12:55 pm
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), and concludes that it’s high time to re-examine Lohr’s restrictions on the use of preemption in non-PMA medical device litigation:This article questions whether litigants and courts have ignored major statutory and regulatory changes in the FDA’s authority over medical devices and have too simplistically followed the Supreme Court’s decision in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996)) called “Invasix” that the FDA had cleared for marketing and labeling for certain uses. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:13 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 485 (1996)]). [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:50 pm
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996). [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:05 pm
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), but there can be ? [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:56 am
The Supreme Court emphatically held in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996). [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) – decided on a motion to dismiss – speculated might have stated such a claim. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:41 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996).We haven’t seen anybody take us up on that idea (yet), but we’re not letting that stop us. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996)) – by itself – in 2004. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:59 pm
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) rationale. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 487 (1996). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:04 pm
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), so when we do, it's a big deal. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:00 pm
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) – yeah, we’re lawyers, we’re weird that way. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:44 am
The plaintiffs in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:53 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996)? [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
March 28, 1997) (reaffirming PTO 12 in light of Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
We’re always open to flattery, and it’s flattering to us when somebody thinks that we provide the best legal research available (at least without a prescription). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), Justice Scalia insisted that the Court has never suggested it would be skeptical of preemption unless the congressional substitute operated like the tort system. [read post]
