Search for: ""Miller v. California" OR "413 U.S. 15"" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2014, 9:07 am by Jeff Welty
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (establishing the boundaries of obscenity for purposes of the First Amendment). [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:08 am
California 413 U.S. 15 (1973)(developing three part test for obscenity)Roe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 8:31 pm by justinsilverman
California 413 U.S. 15 (1973): Would “the average person, applying contemporary community standards” find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest? [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)), child pornography (Ashcroft v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:18 am
Orito, 413 U.S. 139 (1973). [read post]
9 Jan 2006, 4:42 pm
California, 413 U.S. 15, 24 (1973), by establishing a three-part test for obscenity: "hard core" sexual material that appeals to the prurient interest; is patently offensive under community standards; and lacks serious literary or other value. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (upholding criminalization of obscenity); Smith v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
California, 413 U.S. 15, 23 (1973) (listing “scientific speech” as a category of fully protected speech); American School of Magnetic Healing v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (upholding criminalization of obscenity); Smith v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:05 am by Susan Brenner
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), which held that obscene material is not protected by the 1st Amendment. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]