Search for: ""P.L. 111-148"" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2012, 9:38 am by Laura Orr
The vote in Congress on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148 (2010)) was as follows:House: 219-212Senate: 60-39(Source: Thomas dot gov, August 27, 2012)"Brief Legislative History: H.R. 3590:9/17/2009: Introduced in House10/8/2009: Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 416 - 0 (16 not voting) (Roll no. 768).12/24/2009: Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate… [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:54 pm by Jennifer Morgan
Indiana’s Attorney General, Greg Zoeller, joined the multi-state federal lawsuit which alleges that P.L. 111-148 (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23rd) is unconstitutional. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Under the biologics pathway provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148), § 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:41 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- A debate has begun on the meaning of the term "exclusivity" in the follow-on biologics pathway provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148), § 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Joe Barton (R-TX)) who sponsored the follow-on biologics portion of the comprehensive health care reform bill past year (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590, now P.L. 111-148)) have sent a letter to the Food and Drug Administration, purportedly to explain the "legislative intent" of the data exclusivity provisions of the bill. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Members of Congress, from both houses, have let the Food and Drug Administration know their views on the distinction between "data exclusivity" and "market exclusivity" under the follow-on biologics pathway provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148, § 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 5:27 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“Section 1341 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA; P.L. 111-148, as amended) establishes a transitional reinsurance program that is designed to provide payment to non-grandfathered, non-group market health plans (also known as individual market health plans) that enroll high-risk enrollees for 2014 through 2016. [read post]
9 May 2012, 3:03 pm by Laura Orr
(If the latter, you’ll need to be specific about which version of the law the page number appears.)This information may help - or so we can hope:Public Law (PL number): the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is P.L. 111-148 (signed into law March 23, 2010)Session law citation is 124 Stat 119 (and many more): Find quick citations to the enrolled bill, the Statutes at Large (session law), U.S. [read post]
9 May 2012, 3:03 pm by Laura Orr
(If the latter, you’ll need to be specific about which version of the law the page number appears.)This information may help - or so we can hope:Public Law (PL number): the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is P.L. 111-148 (signed into law March 23, 2010)Session law citation is 124 Stat 119 (and many more): Find quick citations to the enrolled bill, the Statutes at Large (session law), U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:39 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
 March 13, 2014 “The Affordable Care Act (ACA, P.L. 111-148, as amended) includes reforms of the health insurance market that impose requirements on private health insurance plans. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:49 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“Congress has seen a renewed interest in the market for private health insurance since the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA; P.L. 111-148, as amended). [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 10:53 am by Lisa Peters
Interested in the significant regulatory actions* taken under the PPACA (the Affordable Care Act, P.L. 111-148) or the Dodd-Frank Act (Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, P.L. 111-203)? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:12 am by Heidi Henson
The House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee will hold a hearing on the IRS’s implementation and administration of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (P.L. 111-148) and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-152). [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:25 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA; P.L. 111-148, as amended) has numerous provisions affecting private health insurance and public health coverage programs. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:53 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“Congress has seen a renewed interest in the market for private health insurance since the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA; P.L. 111-148, as amended). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by LindaMBeale
Amdt. 9) to the Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization act (S. 223) that would repeal the 1099 reporting requirements added by the health care reform law (P.L. 111-148) that mandates reporting of payments totaling $600 or more in a year to a single vendor. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm by Jason Greis
After almost a year of heated debate, President Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act (P.L. 111-148) (“PPACA” or the “Act”) on March 23, 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability Act of 2010 (H.R. 4872) (“HCEAA”) on March 30, 2010. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 1:57 pm by James R. Marsh
P.L. 111-148 increased the tax credit from $10,000 to as much as $13,170. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:46 am by csc4
Concerning health care, budget proposals for the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Justice (see Assist State, Local and Tribal Law Enforcement, p. 1), support provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148) such as providing mandatory funds for states to reform their medical malpractice laws. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:38 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The argument is that such expenses are or will be covered by insurance under the Affordable Care Act and therefore, they need not be awarded by a jury.Plaintiffs argue that the well-settled Collateral Source Rule should preclude any mention of any benefits from a collateral source in an effort to preclude or diminish the recovery of compensation from the alleged wrongdoer.While the Collateral Source Rule has been around for a while, the Affordable Care Act is a relatively new law.By way of… [read post]