Search for: ""Patterson v. McLean Credit Union" OR "491 U.S. 164""
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2011, 7:46 am
McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 173-174 (1989); or whether facts have so changed, or come to be seen so differently, as to have robbed the old rule of significant application or justification, e.g., Burnet, supra, at 412 (Brandeis, J. dissenting).13 The silent overrule is the preferred method of the Roberts Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 11:55 am
McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 172–73 (1989)). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm
McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164 (1989). [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 3:46 pm
McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 175 n.1 (1989).In Justice Scalia's Johnson dissent, which the majority adopts in Patterson, he explained the reason why congressional inaction lacks persuasive force:[O]ne must ignore rudimentary principles of political science to draw any conclusions regarding that intent from the failure to enact legislation. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:35 am
McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 187-88 (1989) (indicating a plaintiff "might seek to demonstrate that respondent's claim to have promoted a better qualified applicant was pretextual by showing that she was in fact better qualified than the person chosen for the position").... [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:40 am
McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 173-174 (1989); or whether facts have so changed or come to be seen so differently, as to have robbed the old rule of significant application or justification, e. g., Burnet, supra, at 412 (Brandeis, J., dissenting). [read post]
