Search for: ""Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc." OR "552 U.S. 312""
Results 41 - 60
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), over whether tort claims could be “requirements” within the meaning of the statute. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312, 319. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008) and “impliedly preempted” — “implied preemption” is a code-phrase conservative judicial activists use when they want to pretend Congress tried to stop state tort lawsuits even when it didn’t — under § 337a of the MDA as interpreted by Buckman v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 10:34 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:00 pm
More recently, the Supreme Court in Riegel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:53 am
Anybody remember Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
March 28, 1997) (reaffirming PTO 12 in light of Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:00 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312, 315 (2008). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:26 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), doesn’t apply to IDE devices, Burgos is OK to that extent.The decision also kicks out a somewhat bizarre claim based on purported improper record-keeping that, while invoking 21 C.F.R. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008) (and even before) have found tort claims involving investigational devices to be preempted. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008).Even though we’re all lawyers here, we try to stay away from legal jargon and “inside baseball” stuff as much as possible. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), PMA cases basically boil down to “parallel” violation claims. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008) was decided, we put up a post, “Riegel at (Almost) Six Months,” where we surveyed the immediate aftermath of the Supreme Court’s preemption decision. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 1:37 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 12:06 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 11:56 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:10 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), may nonetheless be preempted by 21 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:16 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
