Search for: ""Terry v. Ohio" OR "392 U.S. 1"" Results 1 - 20 of 123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2023, 3:52 pm by William Weinberg
Ohio (1968) 392 U.S. 1., where that court held that an officer may conduct a brief investigative detention when there is reasonable suspicion that the individual stopped is armed or where the officer suspects criminal activity is afoot. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am by Alex Phipps
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), as they had a valid arrest warrant for defendant for a crime involving a weapon, knew he was a member of a gang, and saw another individual leave the house wearing a ballistic vest. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 4:48 am by Jeff Welty
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), would have supported the search and seizure, not necessitating the full analysis the majority utilized. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm by Phil Dixon
Short-form indictments for statutory sex offense and indecent liberties using identical language for each charge and joined for trial were not defective State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), the landmark Supreme Court ruling that authorizes warrantless pat-frisk searches if the police have reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:46 am by Orin S. Kerr
One of the fascinating questions raised by the United States Supreme Court's 2018 decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:58 am by MBettman
Ohio392 U.S. 1 (1968) (When police officers have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has just occurred or is about to occur they may engage in a limited search of a person to check for weapons. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:22 am by MBettman
Ohio392 U.S. 1 (1968) (When police officers have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has just occurred or is about to occur they may engage in a limited search of a person to check for weapons. [read post]