Search for: ""United States v. Booker" OR "543 U.S. 220""
Results 21 - 40
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2008, 11:46 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 8:54 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), in imposing sentence is a question of law we review de novo. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:53 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), to reduce a sentence beyond the retroactive United States Sentencing Guidelines amendment range. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 4:48 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 5:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:27 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005)? [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:51 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005)). [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:40 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005)) to 63 and 45 months in prison, respectively. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
United States, No. 09-6338 (U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:56 am
" United States v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:48 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 7:34 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 10:16 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), Smart's sentencing court concluded that his United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines") range of 168 to 210 months' imprisonment overstated the seriousness of his offense, and varied downward, imposing a sentence of 120 months' imprisonment. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:44 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:58 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and now Rita v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 9:14 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:13 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005) and United States v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 6:40 pm
Booker, 543, U.S. 220 (2005) affected federal sentencing? [read post]