Search for: ""United States v. Booker" OR "543 U.S. 220""
Results 21 - 40
of 107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2010, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:04 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:17 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005); Crawford v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:17 am
The Proposed Amendments also take into account the Supreme Court’s landmark holding in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 12:48 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005)), the Ninth Circuit vacated Berger's sentence and remanded to the district court for re-sentencing. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 12:48 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005)), the Ninth Circuit vacated Berger’s sentence and remanded to the district court for re-sentencing. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:13 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005) and United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:53 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), to reduce a sentence beyond the retroactive United States Sentencing Guidelines amendment range. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:51 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 9:36 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 240 (2005), the Supreme Court correctly characterized United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:00 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a district court abuses its discretion by declining to consider the disparity between a recommended Guidelines sentence and the maximum sentence a defendant would receive if convicted of the same conduct in state court. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 7:23 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
United States, 551 U.S. 338 (2007), Gall v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 apply with equal force to sentence reductions under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:47 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and remand the case to the district court for resentencing. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:30 pm
One example of such a case was United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 12:41 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. at 258-60. [read post]
21 May 2009, 6:40 pm
Booker, 543, U.S. 220 (2005) affected federal sentencing? [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:28 am
" Booker, 543 U.S. at 263; accord United States v. [read post]